Monday, 28 October 2013

DR. CHARLES KRAUTHAMMER

A genuinely moving report on Dr. Charles Krauthammer. A must watch and share.
He has just penned a new book called Things That Matter which I urge you to buy.

Thursday, 24 October 2013

POST SHUTDOWN - HOW THE GOP CAN TRIUMPH IN 2014

Following the recent partial government shutdown, the GOP were ridiculed by the mainstream media and establishment lawmakers for their actions. Since the deal arranged by the establishment parties in Congress, the media have called it a victory for Obama and ObamaCare.

The question that needs to be asked is this: 
The government shutdown has ended… what next for the GOP?
The answer lies in The Heritage Foundation and their findings from a study called: How Will You Fare in the Obamacare Exchanges? 

It portrays a sorry tale for the millions of Americans being affected by ObamaCare and the increased premiums which they will have to pay for. 
Correct, ObamaCare was upheld in the Supreme Court and was endorsed with Obama’s election back in 2012. But that shouldn't mean that we can’t take this battle to the ‘court of public opinion’.

Congressman Peter King (R-NY) has said that the only way to defund or remove ObamaCare is by getting a majority in Congress and by taking the White House. That is the clear agenda for the GOP but the question is to how can that be done. 
The GOP is united in their ultimate goal, the problem is how to get to that place and that is where you have McCain vs. Cruz and Graham vs. Lee.

Here is a winning strategy:

Assume the GOP retains their majority in the House; there are 33 U.S. Senate seats up for election in 2014. Of those seats, 13 are currently held by Republicans and 20 are held by Democrats. The Democrats hold the majority with 54 seats to the GOP’s 46.

The GOP has the hand that can do this; all they need to do is play it smart. The key is ObamaCare and not the way they have been playing it till now.
There are 376 days until the midterm elections. Each day, the GOP should place and ad, call a press conference, a prime-time interview or a YouTube clip with members of the public actually being affected by ObamaCare and the higher premiums.

  •          Take the family of four from Virginia who will see their insurance go up by 178%!!! Interview them, ask them to explain as to how they are going to have to cut back or have lost their jobs.
  •          Speak with the 50 year old from Texas who will have to fork out 91.2% each year towards their insurance premiums as a result of the Affordable Care Act.
  •          Have a chat with the 27 year old and the so-called ‘invincible’, who will see an increase of 168.3% on their premiums.

Each and every day until November 2014, the GOP including the RNC should be buying out ad times in newspapers, radio station’s, television networks and in heavily DNC districts and bringing to the people the real impacts of Obama’s signature legislation.

The idea is to drip feed the real effect of ObamaCare to the American people, so even the layman in the street, who couldn't care about politics, is aware of the mess which is ObamaCare and who is to blame.

Each day, the GOP members, including Senators and Representatives should continuously refer to the specific name of the family or individual of the day.
When giving an interview to FOX, CNN or MSNBC – they must mention the name of that person and personalize the issue. 
When Sen.Ted Cruz says that ‘I am standing up for the millions of Americans’; I am sure he feels he is, but it just doesn't resonate as much as referring to a human being, a real case which you can visualize and empathize with.

If the GOP is really serious about taking back Congress and in turn with that, totally blunting Obama and his fundamental transformation of America this is the silver bullet.

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

GEORGE GALLOWAY - HATEFUL AS EVER!!!!!

George Galloway is a vile human being. I wrote the following article about him back in June 2013. He informed the world that he may wish to run for Mayor of London in 2016. If that article hasn't convinced you, perhaps this one will. 

See the following 2 minute video from the Oxford Union debating society:



He was able to claim that Israel is fascist state all because the English Defense League (EDL), used an Israeli flag at a recent demonstration. 
What he neglected to mention was that the Israeli embassy had condemned the use of the flag and asked that it not be used by the EDL. 

Let's adopt the Galloway logic in this case. If Israel is fascist state solely because a fascist group like the EDL used it's flag, then we must apply it equally. 

He used to work for Press TV which is an Iranian State broadcaster. The program is shown in the UK. 

Due to his association with Iran and the 'Mullahocracy'; he must surely be homophobic. 

A Human Rights Watch study brought up the issue of the Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgendered (LGBT) community within Iran. According to the report {LGBT's} are also targets of discrimination. 
Iranians suspected of being gay face societal abuses, acts of violence and constant pressure. Citing a Human Rights Watch study, the report found that “family members threatened and abused many young gay men, who also faced harassment from religious scholars, schools, and community elders.” Again, security forces monitor the internet to collect information on members and supporters of the LGBT community. 

Former President, Mahmud Ahmadinejad is on record as saying : "In Iran we don't have homosexuals like in your country (USA)... In Iran we do not have this phenomenon. I don't know who's told you that we have this."

George Galloway surely has to be condemned for such associations which are reprehensible. Why the Oxford Union keep inviting him back, only they can tell you!!!

University campuses claim to champion pluralistic values - by inviting vile, hateful people like George Galloway back to such events, it will only go onto make these institutions more out of touch then they already are.    

Wednesday, 9 October 2013

Netanyahu Responds to Abbas’s Praise of Hitler’s Mufti

I had to post this article which was forwarded to me. Why do we have to get in bed with these vile animals!
Well done David Bedein, good work!

Posted By David Bedein On October 7, 2013 @ 12:10 am In Daily Mailer,FrontPage 

On January 4, 2013, Mahmoud Abbas, spoke via video link on a wide screen to the masses in Gaza, who gathered to celebrate the founding of Fatah (Arabic word for “conquest”),  otherwise known as the Palestine Liberation Organization.
In his New Year’s speech, Abbas spoke glowingly of the legacy of the Godfather of the PLO, the Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Muhammad Amin Al-Husseini, who during the 1920′s and 1930’s instigated pogroms against the Jews of Palestine and who during his residence in Nazi Germany actively plotted a Final Solution to be carried out once his German allies would win the war.
Abbas praised the Mufti as a man whose ways should be emulated by all Palestinian Arabs.
“We must remember the pioneers, the Grand Mufti of Palestine, Hajj Muhammad Amin Al-Husseini, as well as Ahmad Al-Shukeiri, the founder of the PLO,” Abbas said, according to a translation of the speech made by the Middle East Media Research Institute (MEMRI).

At the time, our agency asked Israeli President Shimon Peres and Israeli Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu for comment on the Mufti’s praise of Hitler’s ally. Since the Israeli government is on record as defining Abbas as a partner for peace, one would have expected a response which expressed horror and revulsion.

Instead, there was silence from the highest officials of the Israeli government.
Peres’s office said that there would be no response. Netanyahu’s office said that there would be a response, in due time.

Nine months after the Abbas praise of the Mufti, on Oct. 6, 2013, Prime Minister Benyamin Netanyahu chose the venue of a policy speech at Bar Ilan University to respond to the emulation lauded on the Mufti by Abbas and by the official curriculum of the Palestinian Authority.

Israel’s Prime Minister quoted the protocols of the Hitler-Mufti pact, presented as evidence against the Mufti in the Nuremberg war crimes trials. The records of the meeting between Hitler and the Mufti explicitly state that Hitler would exterminate the Jews in Europe, while the Mufti would enlist Nazi aid to exterminate Jews in Palestine, so as to establish a “JudenRein” state of Palestine.
To that end, the Mufti ensconced himself in Hitler’s bunker, from where he recruited an Islamic unit of the Waffen SS, which actively engaged in the mass murder of Jews, while issuing Arabic language appeals on Nazi radio that incited Moslems to join the Nazi cause and to prepare for mass murder of Jews in Palestine.

The Protocols of the Nuremberg trials concerning the Mufti were published in a 1946 book, titled “Mufti of Jerusalem,” authored by journalist Maurice Pearlman, who was appointed in 1948 by Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben Gurion, as the first director of the Israel Government Press Office.
Pearlman reported that the refusal of the British government to arrest the Mufti in Cairo caused the head of the Zionist revisionists in the United States at the time, Ben Zion Netanyahu, the late father of Israel’s current Prime Minister, to launch an unsuccessful campaign to push the US to demand the arrest of the Mufti in Cairo.

In his Bar Ilan speech, Netanyahu cited affidavits of senior SS prosecution witnesses who testified that the Mufti, working directly under Eichmann and Himmler, identified the Mufti’s instrumental role in making sure that millions of Jews were murdered, and not ransomed.
Netanyahu referred to the affidavit of one of Eichmann’s subordinates, SS Hampsturmfuerer Dieter Wisliceny, who appeared as a witness for the Nuremberg prosecution, where the Nazi officer testified that,
The Mufti was one of the initiators of the systematic extermination of European Jewry for the Germans and had been the permanent collaborator and advisor of Eichmann and Himmler in the execution of the plan…According to my opinion, the Grand Mufti, who had been in Berlin since 1941, played a role in the decision of the German government to exterminate the European Jews, the importance of which must not be disregarded, He had repeatedly suggested to the various authorities with who had been in contact, above all before Hitler, Ribbentrop and Himmler, the extermination of European Jewry. He considered this as a comfortable solution of the Palestinian problem. In his messages broadcast from Berlin, he surpassed us in anti-Jewish attacks. He was one of Eichmann’s best friends and had constantly incited him to accelerate the extermination measures…

Discussion of the Mufti’s role in the extermination of the Jews has been downplayed for years by Israeli officials, who were hesitant to attack the George Washington of the PLO. Perhaps that would spoil the moderate image of the PLO as a peace partner.

Now Israel’s Prime Minister has placed the Mufti’s legacy on the agenda.
A little known fact concerns the Mufti’s special relationship with a young relative in Cairo, to whom the Mufti would affectionately give the name “Yassir Arafat.” In December 1996, Haaretz interviewed Yassir Arafat’s younger brother and sister, who said that the Mufti performed the role of a surrogate father figure and mentor to the young Arafat.


Prime Minister Netanyahu’s erudite reference to the Mufti’s role in the mass murder of Jews in World War II was not lost on pundits who followed every word of his speech. After all, that mass murder of Jews is currently taught in Palestinian Authority schools in accordance with Abbas’s 1983 doctoral thesis at the University of Moscow, which concludes that the World Zionist Organization, not the Nazi party, was responsible for the destruction of European Jewry.

I have written about the Mufti before and it is vital that we question our so-called partners in peace. 

Tuesday, 8 October 2013

Why does Obama not want child cancer sufferers' to receive vital treatment?

When Obama talked about his sequestration proposal (automatic budget cuts) and the effects of a government shutdown, he really looks and sounds terrible.

Presidents can have a sombre mood when it comes to facing a big issue or a major tragedy but the idea is that America is a can do nation for example:

·         FDR after Pearl Harbour – sombre but resilient.
·         George Bush after 9/11 reflective, yet unyielding.


On Sequester, Obama gave news conference after news conference trying to describe the effects of such a drastic cut in spending. No (decent) President will ever talk down to the American people nor portray a doomsday scenario – unless it is genuine.
Obama has a habit of doing this. Whenever he doesn’t get what he wants, he cries wolf to a usually adoring media, who will lap it up and replay his plea constantly to the public at large.

When the Sequester happened, the automatic cuts came in and everything is running normally or not out of the ordinary. Essentially Obama was defeated. He tried to diminish the American spirit to achieve a Congressional victory and failed.

We now turn to the partial government shutdown and that fact that 87% of the government is running ordinarily.
Obama, as with Sequester, knowing that only 15% of the government is out of action, is at it again. Yet in this case, he has changed his tactics from last time.  Now, he is actively closing monuments and memorials such as the WWII monument in Washington, D.C. -even when he has no right to do so. In that instance, Obama ordered that a chainlink fence be erected around the World War II Memorial denying anyone in. Subsequently the Veterans turned back the years, stormed the memorial, retook control and sang Amazing Grace!! That is the American spirit!

 
He has ordered his Democrat colleagues not to restart the government unless the whole Continuing Resolution is agreed between all parties.

If the attack on the Veterans wasn’t distasteful enough from our President, then let us have a look at how he wishes to treat children suffering with cancer.
Barack Obama has instructed the National Institute of Health (NIH) that they can’t start any new testing of anything – until the CR is approved. He still says this even though the NIH offers children with cancer lastchance experimental treatment.

As soon as the Republicans found out about it, they offered to pass a bill to fund the NIH so the kids may have a chance of survival. The President said he will veto the GOP bill it if it gets to his desk.

The GOP is not blameless here. The United States Government, including Obama are all disconnected from the American people. But when you look at the bold facts here, knowing that negotiating will take a while, don’t you just want to take whatever you can get here, Mr President?

If Government is vital, each component essential to the running of the country, why not take a 3% of what you can get now.

On Gun Control, Obama said that if his (now failed) legislation and executive orders save just one life it would be worth it. Why can’t you apply the same principle here with children suffering from cancer? Are you willing to stand in the way and possibly see a child die from this heatless disease, just to make a political point?    


My question is: 

Why does Obama not want child cancer sufferers' to receive vital treatment? 

Sunday, 6 October 2013

OBAMACARE EXPLAINED IN ONE SENTENCE


Most know the political angle and how it was rammed through a Democrat super-majority in Congress, but the essential question is whether ObamaCare is a good law or not? When I say good law, I mean will it:

a) Increase the insured, b) lower premiums and c) improve the quality of care.

a)    What ObamaCare certainly does is increase the insured. By aggressively expanding Medicaid eligibility at a subsidized rate it will bring millions into the system and giving them an opportunity for coverage.  

b)    It simply cannot lower premiums. The way ObamaCare was designed was to refuse insurance companies from rejecting people due to a pre-existing injury. ObamaCare also requires additional benefits to be offered regardless of the applicant(s). This range from: No Pre-existing conditions rejections, to, no caps on annual benefits.  When you have such a list of benefits that need to be added to a policy, the premiums will naturally skyrocket.

c)    The idea of improving quality of care comes when you have the ability to heal the sick. The people that do that are doctors and they are scathing about ObamaCare. A survey was done in 2010 by the Physicians Foundation in which 4 out of 10 were dissatisfied with the law and indicated that they would leave the profession, rather than treat the expanded Medicaid roll. There is already a doctor’s shortage and the idea of ObamaCare fully implemented will make things worse as the ratio of doctors to patients will grow rapidly and worsen the quality of care.

The women in the below video is Dr. Barbara Beller. She is from Illinois and is running for District 17, Cook County. Sometime it is worthwhile reminding ourselves of how ObamaCare was formed into law.