Monday, 25 February 2013

POLITICALLY CORRECT MEGILLAH!!!!


I just got this politically correct megillah and even though it's a day late, thought it funny enough to send on.

Chapter I

And it came to pass in the third year of the reign of Achashverosh, King of Persia, that the King threw a great party. And it was during that party, that the King became intoxicated and called for his wife Vashti to come dance naked in front of the guests. Now, Vashti was a liberated woman, and was not at all ashamed to display her body in public ("my body, my choice," she used to say). But she was certainly not going to do so at the behest of a male chauvinist like her husband. So she refused to appear, and the following morning, in addition to a major hangover, Achashverosh had one royal-size sexual harassment suit waiting for him. Public opinion quickly turned against the King, and he was forced to settle out of court for an undisclosed sum of money.

Chapter II

It was after those events that the King missed Vashti, and wanted to find a new wife. He consulted his inner circle of advisors, which, in accordance with multi-cultural practices, consisted of, among others, one woman, one Indian, one Ethiopian, and one handicapped person, who was also rumored to be gay. One of his advisors, Memoochan, suggested holding a beauty contest, attended by all the fairest maidens in the land. But his female advisor informed him that Memoochan was a Neanderthal living in the dark ages, and that beauty contests where men gawk at women walking around in swimsuits had long ago gone out of fashion. Instead, she suggested giving a test in such subjects as physics, literature and music, and the most intelligent woman would be made queen. And the King, already lagging in the public opinion polls, had no choice, and he said to make it so.

Now it just so happened that in the Kingdomof Persia there lived a young Jewish girl named Esther who was very beautiful, but much more importantly, had a 195 IQ. Having successfully sued her parents for termination of custody, she had been living with her uncle Mordechai. Esther aced the test and was chosen to be the new queen. Only, the homosexual community objected the word "queen," and the feminists didn't like the whole gender-based title thing, so it was decided that she would just be called "Royal Person." So Esther was crowned Royal Person of Persia and was married to King Achashverosh, though she kept her own last name. And being that Esther was an intelligent woman in her own right, and had no intention whatsoever of sitting quietly next to the King looking pretty, she was given her own staff of 15 and an office in the west wing of the palace.

Chapter III

It was after those events that King Achashverosh elevated his advisor Haman to be his chief advisor. There were some protests by the African-Persian community because he hadn't selected an African Persian to be his top advisor, but the appointment went through anyway. It turned out the Haman was a big anti-Semite, and he asked the King's permission to kill all the Jews, which he got. So Haman sent out a proclamation to all the lands in the kingdom outlining his plan. Distressed, the Jews sought a court-issued injunction to stop Haman from sending it. But Haman was defended by the head of the Persian Civil Liberties Union, who ironically was also Jewish, and who claimed that the injunction would violate Haman's right to free speech. And the injunction was not issued, so the proclamation was sent.

Chapter IV

And Mordechai knew of all that had happened, and he donned a black ribbon as a sign of mourning. And Esther sent a messenger to Mordechai to console him, but he would not be consoled. Then Mordechai sent word back to Esther that she should go the King and ask him to stop the impending killing of all the Jews. Esther replied that other social issues, such as the environment and harassment in the workplace were more pressing, but Mordechai persuaded her as to the urgency of the matter, and she agreed. Mordechai suggested calling all the Jews to synagogue for three days of fasting and prayers, but Esther thought that was way outdated, and instead called for a non-denominational candlelight vigil, and it was so.

Chapter V

And it came to pass on the third day that Esther put on her smartest business suit and went to see the King. The King offered Esther up to half his assets, which he was actually required to give her anyway, based on their pre-nup. Esther told the King that she had come to invite him and Haman to a big party she was throwing the next day. The King was very excited, and both he and Haman showed up to Royal Person Esther's party. The King, for his part, was careful not to violate the out-of-court settlement he had made with Vashti, and there was none of that "dance naked" stuff that night. The party was a big hit, with performances by Fleetwood Mac and crowd favorite Barbra Streisand. And Esther informed the King that both he and Haman were also invited to her next party, being thrown the following day onMartha's Vineyard. Upon leaving the party, Haman spotted his old nemesis Mordechai, which ruined his night. Haman's wife advised Haman to build a gallows 50 amot tall and ask the King to have Mordechai hanged the next day. She further advised him to quit referring to her as "Haman's Wife." And he built the gallows.

Chapter VI

That night, the King had trouble sleeping. He called for his servants to bring him a video to watch, but since having gotten rid of all his stag films as part of his sensitivity training following the Vashti debacle, all they had left were a bunch of movies filmed in Montanaand produced by Robert Redford. So they brought him the royal archives instead, and there he read that Mordechai had done him a big favor a few years back. Just then, Haman came in, and the King asked him what to do for someone to whom he owed a favor. Haman suggested maybe an ambassadorship to some insignificant but warm-climate country, or maybe letting him spend a night in the palace's "Lincoln Bedroom." But the King decided to have Haman lead Mordechai around on a horse throughout the streets of Shushan. However, the animal rights activists got wind of the King's plan, and they went nuts, so it was decided that Haman would just lead Mordechai around on foot. And it was so. When he was done leading Mordechai around, Haman walked home, despondent. But no sooner had he returned home than the King's messengers arrived to bring him to Esther's second party. Haman's wife realized that her husband was doomed and commented that she had always known he would never amount to anything.

Chapter VII

And the King and Haman came to drink with Royal Person Esther. And it was during the party that Esther shocked the King by telling him that someone in that very room was plotting to kill her and all the other Jews. "Who is that man?" yelled the King. To which Esther replied "What makes you so sure it's a man? You don't think that a women is capable of killing all the Jewish people?" After an awkward silence, Esther told the King that is was, in fact, a man, and it was none other than his chief advisor Haman! The King stormed out in a fit of rage and meanwhile Haman begged at Esther's feet for her to spare his life. He told her how he had grown up in a broken home, was raised by a crack-selling mother and had never had a normal childhood. Esther declared Haman to be a product of society's failure to protect its children. So Haman's crime of "attempted genocide" was reduced to "issuing proclamations without a license" and he was given the relatively light sentence of five-to-seven years. After serving just two years of that sentence, he was given time off for good behavior and paroled. And the following year, the residents of Shushan elected Haman as their mayor, his being a felon notwithstanding. Meanwhile, Esther convinced the King to come to terms with his anger and latent feelings of hostility towards women, and the King entered a 12-step program and when he was through, his anger had subsided.

Chapter VIII

That day, the King gave Esther Haman's house, and she told the King that Mordechai was her uncle. And Mordechai asked the King's permission for the Jews to rise up and kill their enemies. But Esther would have no such thing, and instead, she arranged for a dialog being the Jewish leaders and the leaders of the people of Shushan. And while they couldn't overcome all their differences, they did agree to joint-author a letter of mutual acceptance and tolerance.

Chapter IX

And in the twelfth month, the month of Adar, on the day when the Jews were supposed to have been exterminated, the Jews held a three-day conference of the Leaders of Jewish Organizations. And during that conference, they agreed that a holiday should be established-the holiday of Purim. A holiday of charity and gift-giving. A holiday of brotherly love. A holiday where alternate-side-of-the-street parking rules would be suspended. A holiday where Jewish kids could dress up like Ninja Turtles and Power Rangers and not have to feel that they had missed out on something by not celebrating Halloween. And a proclamation was sent out to all the King's lands, in all 127 languages, plus Ebonics. And the Jews were careful not to mention G-d's name, lest any of the gentiles be offended.

Chapter X

And King Achashverosh -- the kinder and gentler King Achashverosh -- levied a tax across the land, to raise money to pay for welfare and public television. And the great deeds of Royal Person Esther and her uncle Mordechai were duly recorded in the annals of Persia.

Thursday, 21 February 2013

WHY ARE PEOPLE SCARED OF RUBIO?

Rubio in Israel
Why are people raving about Marco Rubio?

It is for the below interview which he gave to Sky News (United Kingdom) during his visit to Israel and the Middle East. 

He was eloquent, precise, definitive and more importantly correct on some crucial issues.

He didn't bow to the Leftist ‘rallying cry’ of settlements being the core reason for continued delays in resuming peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians.

With regard to Syria he is mindful of arming rebel forces and the lack of action from allied nations.

There is no doubt that he is the future of the Republican Party.

The fact that he is a conservative who is espousing limited government, lower taxes, strong military and freedom for all - on top of that a Cuban-American - frightens the life out of the Democrats and their consultant. They are all too happy to ‘box-in’ minorities for political gain, rather than to boost their livelihood and make them prosper.  

As mentioned in prior blogs; it is vital that conservative minded leaders come forward and offer bold solutions to the issues facing America and the world. The days of complaining about things are over and it is time that the GOP renews itself as a party driven by clear ideas.

With people like Marco Rubio, Paul Ryan, Rand Paul and a host of others taking up the mantle after the disastrous 2012 election; it is clear that the GOP have taken that message on board. 




Wednesday, 20 February 2013

GAY MARRIAGE ACROSS STATE LINES????


Insurers are allowed to sell policies only in states where they are licensed to do business. Which essentially means that you can't purchase Health Care across state lines. 

So for example if live in the state of New York but the state of Colorado has better insurance provider and can offer me cost saving, then I cannot purchase! I am stuck in my state regardless of affordability, accessibility and cost. 

However when it comes to Same Sex Marriage it is different:

The State of Massachusetts can legalize same sex marriage and every 'LGBT' person can flock to 'Bay State' and get married.

Don't get me wrong this is not a homophobic idea. I believe that in the 10th Amendment - states rights. If through an election the constitution of that state votes to legalize it, then you need to listen to the people. 

In my opinion the people in Massachusetts should be the only ones who can enjoy that right. 

You shouldn't be able to "access gay marriage across state lines"
You shouldn't have one rule for Health Care and another for Same Sex Marriage!
you may call it crude or harsh, for me it's only about fairness. 

Access to Healthcare, nationwide will lower costs as competition always lowers prices and increases opportunuity. 

Obama is (supposedly) interested in lowering Health Care premiums. The idea of restricting people when it comes to their health; but not on gay marriage is deplorable in today's age.

People of all backgrounds should be lobbying for equal rights on this. 

OBAMA CAN BE BEATEN!!!

If anyone thinks that Obama is this invincible politician then they really have a short memory. Obama has struggled whenever he's under the microscope and during the 1st debate between Obama & Romney- the President was found out. 



The remaining debates did NOT have the same effect from Romney as he essentially sat on his lead. The old adage "If You Are Not Going Forward You Are Going Backwards" was the reason why Romney failed at the end. 

After the election was over Romney's son, Tagg said about his Dad: 
“{He} wanted to be president less than anyone I've met in my life.” 
If that had come out in the primary, then he would never had gotten the nomination. 

Teddy Kennedy, when he was running a primary challenge against President Jimmy Carter in 1979 was asked a simple question about why he wanted to be President and wasn't able to answer:



That video destroyed him and essentially ended his Presidential aspirations.

The GOP needs to have a clear, optimistic  ideas based vision for America and the world. Ronald Reagan offered that in 1980 when he was officially nominated as Republican nominee for President. He offered a bold vision based on limited government, equality, anti-communism, peace through strength, lower taxes and more freedom for all. 
That he was able to do that was due to his never ending enthusiasm and love of the country.

You didn't have to ask him why he wanted to be President; you just knew it. 



Newt Gingrich was spot on in saying: 
"Republicans need to drop the consultant-centric model and go back to a system in which candidates have to think and consultants are adviser and implementers but understand that the elected official is the one who has to represent the voters and make the key decisions."
I believe that the tide is turning. 
The message has been received and the next generation of conservative leaders will be able to make America sparkle once again through a clear vision. 

OBAMA WILL NEED A NEW COMMUNICATIONS DIRECTOR



President Obama will need a new communications director.

The news coming today offers some great news that Soledad O’Brien (pictured) is leaving CNN, or more like being fired. See the report from the NY POST!!!

There were fewer people on Cable TV who did more to enhance the Obama 2012 campaign than her. The overt contempt that she had for any Romney surrogate or non-Obama conformist was astounding. In a different age it she would have been fired a long time ago. The fact that it took this long to sack her shows how out of touch CNN is with mainstream viewers. 

See below a few excerpts during her time at CNN. It is no wonder that CNN reported their lowest ratings in over a decade with Soledad anchoring. 

It seems that CNN President, Jeff Zucker is learning from past mistakes and putting an agenda of being civil, accurate and fair in reporting - rather than the crap which Soledad spews every morning. 

The signing of Jake Tapper was a masterstroke. 

Ridding CNN of "hacks" such as O'Brien can only improve their ratings. 


GOOD RIDDANCE!!!!!












Thursday, 14 February 2013

BREAKING NEWS!!!! ON HAGEL - ONLY THE GOP WILL STAND UP FOR ISRAEL



DEMOCRATS CARE MORE ABOUT OBAMA THAN STANDING ON PRINCIPAL

THE GOP AND IN PARTICULAR TED CRUZ WILL FIGHT FOR ISRAEL!!!

Cruz with Bibi -Israel 
A FOXNEWS.COM NEWSFLASH IS FURTHER PROOF!!!!




Does 'ObamaCare' cover Democratic Senators who suffer from Amnesia?

The Senate Armed Services Committee voted in favor to nominate Chuck Hagel.  
Every Democrat (including Angus King) voted for Chuck Hagel - Every Republican voted against. It was a party line vote!

Levin, Carl (MI), Chairman of the committee said as follows:
“The President needs to have a Secretary of Defense in whom he has trust, who will give him unvarnished advice, a person of integrity and one who has a personal understanding of the consequences of decisions relative to the use of military force.  Senator Hagel certainly has those critically important qualifications and he is well-qualified to lead the Department of Defense.
It is absolutely clear that Hagel is not what Senator Levin says he is. I have mentioned this in my two previous articles about Hagel! 
You cannot trust him.

Hagel has been on the wrong side of almost every issue such as Iraq, Vietnam, Iran and Israel. Heck, he has intimated that actions carried out by Israel could be considered as war crimes when he was Al-Jazeera. I have only mentioned a few areas, there are other areas where he is equally dangerous. 

How can you have someone leading that (DOD) who isn't able to fully disclose all of his personal financial income over the last 5 years. When Hagel was asked to do so, he said NO and Carl Levin said it was sufficient based on the rules of the committee. He didn't mention that when John Bolton was nominated for UN ambassador (Bush 43) that he said: 
"Every member should add his or her voice to the demand for the production of relevant documents which Senators need to decide on confirmation or for any other legitimate reason."
Mitt Romney was chastised by Obama and Democrats, including Chairman Levin – for not releasing tax returns going back further than two years when he was running for President! 

Does 'ObamaCare' cover Democratic Senators who suffer from amnesia?

One rule for Obama; another rule for others. 

The following Senators voted in favor of Hagel:

Levin, Carl (MI)
Reed, Jack (RI) 
Nelson, Bill (FL) 
McCaskill, Claire (MO) 
Udall, Mark (CO) 
Hagan, Kay R. (NC) 
Manchin, Joe (WV) 
Shaheen, Jeanne (NH) 
Gillibrand, Kirsten E. (NY) 
Blumenthal, Richard (CT) 
Donnelly, Joe (IN) 
Hirono, Mazie K. (HI) 
Kaine, Tim (VA) 
King, Angus S. (ME) 


Not one GOP Senator voted in favor which is further proof that the GOP is the one for protecting Israel and the military in Washington D.C. Watch how Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) tackles Hagel when it came to his Israel - War Crime remark. 


This should be a bipartisan issue in rejecting Hagel. I suggest that the GOP create the above hit list to take these Senators on when they are up for re-election. If they are willing to put Obama ahead of what is right - then they deserve to be challenged by GOP conservative candidates.

The main job of the U.S. secretary of Defense is to plan, develop and execute policies that concern the military affairs and national security of the country.

On that basis alone, Hagel is completely unqualified to do this job.  However since Obama is looking to diminish the military to fund his social welfare projects and Hagel will be only too happy to assist him in that game which inturn, makes him perfect for Obama.

Obama attacked Romney during the third and final debate for playing battleship with the military. It is Obama who is destroying our military with his insistence that America downsizes its capabilities in a world which is more dangerous than before he became President. 

Tuesday, 12 February 2013

THE POPE AND HIS REAL LASTING LEGACY!!!!


 “There is no limit to what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit”.

Everyone, regardless of faith was shocked to hear of the resignation of Pope Benedict XVI.
The first time in over 6 centuries that such a thing has occurred! Come the end of this month, we will be living/seeing/believing a historical moment in our lifetimes.
The resignation letter from Pope stated as follows:

Dear Brothers,

I have convoked you to this Consistory, not only for the three canonizations, but also to communicate to you a decision of great importance for the life of the Church. After having repeatedly examined my conscience before God, I have come to the certainty that my strengths, due to an advanced age, are no longer suited to an adequate exercise of the Petrine ministry. I am well aware that this ministry, due to its essential spiritual nature, must be carried out not only with words and deeds, but no less with prayer and suffering. However, in today’s world, subject to so many rapid changes and shaken by questions of deep relevance for the life of faith, in order to govern the bark of Saint Peter and proclaim the Gospel, both strength of mind and body are necessary, strength which in the last few months, has deteriorated in me to the extent that I have had to recognize my incapacity to adequately fulfill the ministry entrusted to me. For this reason, and well aware of the seriousness of this act, with full freedom I declare that I renounce the ministry of Bishop of Rome, Successor of Saint Peter, entrusted to me by the Cardinals on 19 April 2005, in such a way, that as from 28 February 2013, at 20:00 hours, the See of Rome, the See of Saint Peter, will be vacant and a Conclave to elect the new Supreme Pontiff will have to be convoked by those whose competence it is.
Dear Brothers, I thank you most sincerely for all the love and work with which you have supported me in my ministry and I ask pardon for all my defects. And now, let us entrust the Holy Church to the care of Our Supreme Pastor, Our Lord Jesus Christ, and implore his holy Mother Mary, so that she may assist the Cardinal Fathers with her maternal solicitude, in electing a new Supreme Pontiff. With regard to myself, I wish to also devotedly serve the Holy Church of God in the future through a life dedicated to prayer.

From the Vatican, 10 February 2013

The move is something which is unbecoming of a 21st century public figure. In recent years, we have heard of public figure being embroiled in sex scandals, drugs, pedophilia  phone hacking and all sorts. Very few are able to put their cause above themselves.
There has been controversy surrounding the Church in recent years through the outing of child sex abuses, homosexuality and other such cases which has rocked the faith to its core foundations.

People are going to accuse him of all sorts of things such as running away from the battle or shirking his responsibilities in trying to modernize the Church. However in my opinion the lasting legacy will be on the 28th February 2013 at 20:00 hours when he relinquishes his post in the most dramatic of circumstances - all in the name of proving that sometimes, some things are more important than one man.

To say that the Pope is not up to the job is one thing - but for the Pope to say himself that someone else can do the job better for the sake of his religion is a powerful and profound message to people all over the world today. 

Friday, 8 February 2013

Dr. Benjamin Carson

Dr. Carson
Sometimes a speech is delivered which utterly blows you away.
I found this speech via theblaze.com and it was classy. 
Dr. Carson is pediatric neurosurgeon at Johns Hopkins Hospital - who has published books 
He talked about Political Correctness, Education, Debt, Deficit and the anatomy of a lawyer in Washington. It was truly inspiring to watch. 
What is better is that he gave this speech in front of Barack & Michelle Obama during the National Prayer Breakfast (2/7/13). 
Please share this video to everyone! 
America is not dead yet!

Thursday, 7 February 2013

THE CURSE THAT IS MULTICULTURALISM IN THE UK


Let me preface this piece with my eternal gratitude to The Queen & the British Government for allowing the Jewish people to come into Britain following the Holocaust. It is something that the Jewish people will never forget and we can never repay you enough.

I believe that the United Kingdom is changing and fast. The demographics are shifting away from the traditional values of the past. For example: Christmas Day. There was a time, not too long ago, that no shop would dare be open on that day. Now, you have a swath of outlets open for business. The primary reason for this and many non-traditional things occurring today is that the people are not inclined that way to the founding of the country.

The Tony Blair Project

Whilst the majority of people respect the UK, they appear not to accept, nor care of the traditional aspect of living here. That my friends, is down to a number of things but mainly due to what I call the "complex":

a) mass unchecked migration 
b) lack of a British identity  
c) Political Correctness.

Tony Blair did some amazing things as leader of the country. One of the worst things was his insistence on open borders, to attract new voters for his political party. By adopting this policy under the guise of ‘multiculturalism’, he was merely removing the Great from Great Britain - all for political expediency. In my world, there is no Left vs. Right but rather Good vs.Bad policy. 
The Tony Blair Project aka ‘TBP’ (not to be mistaken with the equally bad Blair Witch Project movie) has to go down as one of the worst policies of recent times.

Issues are about the economy, jobs, NHS and energy prices and elections are won and lost on who can handle those issues better. The problem is that many people today are asking about what government can give them, not what each person can give to better the country. That is down to the "complex" idea mentioned earlier.

Britain no longer has an identity. If you say it is multiculturalism, then I would ask as to how a doctrine in which several different cultures can coexist peacefully and equitably in a single country gives us an identity worth fighting for. All that is, is allowing many people to live parallel lives and not learning to become part of society.

Rowan Williams C of E


If war was to break out in and Britain was called to action, what would fight for the flag represent. By becoming subservient to multiculturalism, you are creating a permanent parallel class who don’t really care about the country, essentially the end of British Exceptionalism.


Make no mistake, I believe in immigration. I believe that people from out of Britain can make a difference and advance the country and make it more prosperous for all. What we have at the moment is a severe identity crisis and lack of moral leadership. 
Case in point is the outgoing Archbishop of Canterbury, Rowan Williams who instead of fighting for The Church of England; is more than happy to accept certain aspects of Sharia Law. Only in Great Britain can you have a leader of a Church so ineptly give way to another religion. Even if he didn't really say that, or was misconstrued, Sharia Law is the antithesis of Christianity and moral teachings and should not be uttered in the same sentence.  

For example let me give you an idea about Shariah Law and their views on women: 

According to the Shari’ah, despite declarations of the equality of the sexes before God - Women are considered inferior to men, and have fewer rights and responsibilities.
A woman counts as half a man in giving evidence in a court of law, or in matters of inheritance.
Her position is less advantageous than a man’s with regard to marriage and divorce.
A husband has the moral and religious right and duty to beat his wives for disobedience or for perceived misconduct.
A woman does not have the right to choose her husband, or her place of residence, to travel freely or have freedom in her choice of clothing.
Women have little or no autonomy and are deemed to need the protection of their fathers, husbands or other male relatives throughout their lives.

You don’t have right for a fair trial and punishment can range from Lashing, Stoning to Chopping off hands, and for the male gender; castration. 

 In Iran these types of punishments are handed out regularly

This man was found guilty of theft and adultery by a court in city of Shiraz, Iran. His punishment was meted out under Sharia law.

If you think the above isn't happening Britain then you are wrong. 
In 2010, there were 2,823 honour killings here. These killings are done following supposed acts deemed to have brought shame on a Muslim family.

Some point to the notion that because these are ancient laws that such positions are not doled out. On some points that is correct but you only have to look at Mali, Algeria and Iran to see that the most grotesque of punishments are still being practiced. Remember the Taliban in Afghanistan!
Iran is run under Shariah Law and there is nothing that we can do about it. Each faith has to modernise and most religions do so. However when you come to the UK it is important to live by the rules and that applies for every faith -including Judaism.

Channel 4 recently produced a program about Jews in Stamford Hill. The majority of Jewish people knew that the program was correct in exposing the fallacy of what certain rabbinical leader were claiming and therein lies the difference. 
The majority of Jewish people saw that was totally wrong and stood up in a peaceful and democratic way to denounce such behaviour. It was similar to the Sunday Times cartoon - blood libel. The Jewish people didn't riot, burn down flags, kill an ambassador nor declare a fatwa. We responded in a civilsed manner, in keeping with the timeless values of freedom of speech and respect - and got what we wanted, which was an apology. 

I yearn for the day, in which the majority of Muslims publicly stand up to the supposed few who are perverting Islam in the name of violence and intolerance.

I haven’t a clue as to how Britain can be saved from this. I am not sure that it is reversible. When you give an inch, you lose metre and that is what multiculturalism does to a country.

Britain gave away its Parliamentary Sovereignty to the EU.
It is clear that Britain has sold its soul in the name of multiculturalism and it isn't coming back.

Rule, Britannia! Britannia, rule the waves!